Legal Opinion

Howe v. Stuart

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal-by a judgment creditor from an order of the City Court of the city of Hew York denying a motion to punish a third party for contempt in supplementary proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

The attorney of the judgment debtor, while being examined as a third party in supplementary proceedings, refused .to answer certain questions put to him concerning the property of Ms client. The questions asked were: Q. “Do yon manage any real estate for him? A. I decline to answer on the ground of privilege of counsel.” Q. “ Have you any property of Mr. Stuart’s ? A. I decline to answer on the ground of privilege of counsel.”

The preliminary objection made by respondent, that he was not personally served with the order denying his motion to vacate the proceeding and fixing a further date for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Matter of DepueNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Charman v. TatumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Phoebus v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Grant v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Vehicular Parking, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  2. In re the Accounting of RowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. L. Michel Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Randall Avenue Theatre Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  4. Circle Floor Co. v. Siltan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ruth E. v. David E.New York City Family Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API