In re McNeil
Ohio Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBaynes, J.
This is an appeal of an order by a three-commissioner panel which affirmed an order of a single commissioner which denied an award of reparations from the Victims of Crime Fund. The panel decision was by a majority, one commissioner of the panel dissenting. The panel, without opinion, found and concluded that the single commissioner had properly stated the issues and interpreted the law and approved, affirmed and adopted the order appealed from.
Appellant’s assignments of error, as set forth, are:
“1. The single commissioner and the panel of commissioners erred in denying an award of reparation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re SchroepferOhio Court of Claims · 1983
- McComis v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re SaylorOhio Court of Claims · 1982
- In re DeCerboOhio Court of Claims · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fisher v. Kansas Crime Victims Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- McMillan v. Crime Victims Compensation BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986