Legal Opinion

Klavon v. Tindall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1956No. Appeal, No. 143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This case arose on a bill in equity filed by plaintiff to compel defendants, husband and wife, owners of adjoining property, to remove obstructions which they had placed in an alleyway on their premises and to cease and desist from interfering with plaintiff’s free and unobstructed use of the same. Plaintiff also sought to recover damages alleged to have been suffered as the result of the obstructions of the alleyway. The chancellor concluded that plaintiff had acquired an easement in the alleyway, directed the immediate removal of the obstructions and enjoined further…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Hunter v. McKlveenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Piro v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Overly v. HixsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Miller v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brodt v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Steel v. YocumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Kaufer v. BeccarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. DiVirgilio v. ETTORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API