Legal Opinion

Brodt v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1961No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from a decree of the court below sitting in equity, enjoining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ free and uninterrupted use of an unopened, undedicated street, situated between properties of the parties litigant.

Each and every legal question raised by this appeal, with the exception of two, have been adequately dis cussed and correctly answered in the adjudication of Judge Barthold in the court below and need no further amplification herein. We shall restrict our discussion to those questions unanswered in the lower court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Board of Medical Education v. SchiresonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Schireson v. ShaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Appeal of FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. O'Donnell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Gabster v. MesarosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Siegel v. EngstromSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. In Re: Estate of Moskowitz, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API