Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corporation
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendant seeks judgment on the pleadings as contemplated by Rule 12 (c) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that the motion is timely. The essential question, however, is whether plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy is before the South Carolina Industrial Commission by virtue of the fact that the incidents referred to in the complaint, and out of which the accident arose, took place while she was at work on the premises of, and as an employee of, the defendant. If the exclusive remedy is under jurisdiction of the South Carolina Industrial Commission, this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. McLellan's Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Shealy v. Algernon Blair, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Keeter v. CLIFTON MFG. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Thompson v. J. A. Jones Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Ingle v. Dunean MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Freeman v. Kelvinator, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Patterson v. Augat Wiring Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Doe v. South Carolina State HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Summers v. Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.