Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Kelvinator, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 1, 1979No. Civ. A. 572314PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEIKENS, District Judge.

On January 19, 1979 I granted Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint to include a prayer for compensatory and exemplary damages under the Michigan Elliot-Larson Civil Rights Act, M.C.L.A. § 37.2101 et seq. Plaintiffs submitted a proposed amendment. Defendant opposes paragraphs “BB” and “CC” and requests I deny their addition to the complaint. 1

Defendant’s motion could be denied under Rule 12(g) of the F.R.Civ.P. which requires all grounds for a motion to be joined. Defendant has previously argued that plaintiffs should not be allowed compensatory damages…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Broaddus v. Ferndale Fastener Division, Ring Screw WorksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Moore v. Federal Department Stores, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Odriozola v. Superior Cosmetic Distributors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
  2. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ledsinger v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API