Legal Opinion

Burke ex rel. Burke v. Beveridge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

It has been definitely settled in this state that in mandamus proceedings the alternative writ and the demurrer thereto, so far as this case is concerned, constitute the entire record to be considered by the court. This court cannot look to the petition for the alternative writ for the purpose of enlarging or supporting the writ: Sections 618-620, *22Or. L.; Dryden v. Daly, 89 Or. 218, 225 (173 Pac. 667); Elliott y. Oliver, 22 Or. 44 (29 Pac. 1); McLeod v. Scott, 21 Or. 94 (26 Pac. 1060, 29 Pac. 1).

Pleadings when tested by demurrer will be construed most strongly against the pleader: Loveland v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Longshore Printing Co. v. HowellOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Blumauer-Frank Drug Co. v. Horticultural Fire ReliefOregon Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mattoon v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Northern Life Insurance v. NortonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. International Transportation Equipment Lessors, Inc. v. BohannonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Scott v. DobsonOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API