Legal Opinion

Bemmerly v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1902No. Sac. No. 842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action brought to recover damages for trespass upon real estate, coupled with a prayer for injunction to restrain the commission of threatened waste. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial.

The main issue litigated at the trial involved the terms of a lease or cropping contract, plaintiffs insisting that by its terms they were entitled to one third of the volunteer grain raised upon a certain tract of land farmed by defendant, and defendant insisting that they were only entitled to one fourth of said grain. The trial court made findings of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abram v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Anthony v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. K. Mark Mekhitarian v. David Ramirez, City of Fresno, and Does 1 through 10, inclusiveDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API