Legal Opinion
K. Mark Mekhitarian v. David Ramirez, City of Fresno, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 2, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01135Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 K. MARK MEKHITARIAN, No. 1:25-cv-01135-KES-SAB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 DAVID RAMIREZ, CITY OF FRESNO, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. Doc. 13 16 17 18 Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff K. Mark Mekhitarian’s first amended complaint 19 (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim. Doc. 13. Mekhitarian did not file an opposition to 20 defendants’ motion to dismiss and the deadline to do so has passed. The Court has considered the 21 FAC and defendants’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.