Abram v. Stuart
California Supreme Court
. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
— On the 14th of July, 1890, the defendant Kaslowsky, to secure payment of the sum of $504.21, executed to the plaintiff a mortgage upon a certain mining claim and water-ditch, which he had owned for many years, known as the Stony Bar claim and Stony Bar ditch.
On the 23d of May, 1890, Kaslowsky and one Graydon located another mining claim, known as the Red Hill claim, which seems to have adjoined the Stony Bar claim, and across which the Stony Bar ditch extended.
In June, 1890, Graydon, and the defendants Stuart and Kaslowsky, began to work the Red Hill claim by the hydraulic…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sierra Union Water & Mining Co. v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Brenot v. BrenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gibson v. HammangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Coffman v. BushardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.