Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. v. Forcum/Mackey Construction, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2004No. G032543PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Cross-complainant BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of cross-defendants Forcum/Mackey Construction Inc. (Forcum) and S.C. Anderson, Inc. (Anderson) (collectively defendants) after their demurrers were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff contends the court erred by holding that its claims for implied indemnity required a predicate tort. We find the demurrers were correctly sustained without leave to amend and affirm.

FACTS

Porterville Unified School District (district) and plaintiff entered into a contract whereby…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mason & Dixon Intermodal v. Lapmaster International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Prince v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Nak Sealing Technologies Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API