Legal Opinion

Smedley v. Smedley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1995No. 94-782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, James E. Smedley, appeals from a probate judge’s finding that he had a mental illness and posed a clear and present danger to himself, which resulted in his being committed involuntarily to an out-of-state mental health receiving facility for a period of forty-five days pursuant to Act 861 of 1989, as codified in Ark. Code Ann. § 20-47-215 (Repl. 1991).

Mr. Smedley acknowledges that his case is moot, as the period of his involuntary hospitalization has past, yet he appeals on the grounds that we should review the trial court’s findings because the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Mastin v. MastinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Beatty v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of WoodruffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Magnus v. CarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API