Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Magnus v. Carr

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 2002No. 02-604Published

1ConcurrenceDonald L. Corbin, Justice

I agree with stmajority ice, trial court and this court are without jurisdiction under the facts of this case to review Appellant Jim Magnus’s qualifications as a legislator. Pursuant to Article 5, § 11, of the Arkansas Constitution, the issue whether Magnus is required to reside in the district from where he was elected is a matter to be determined exclusively by the House of Representatives. Therefore, I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in restraining Magnus from voting or otherwise participating in any legislative session that may be called during the remainder of his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stilley v. McBrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Harris v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Villines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Catlett v. Republican Party of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API