Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Copelan, Chief of Police
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1935No. 4694PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, PJ.
The majority of the court, including tn-e writer of this opinion, considers that the original trial being in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati, the ordinances of such city, as well as the charter, are matters of which that court and all succeeding courts considering the case must take judicial notice. The rule is well stated in Hanley et v Donoghue, 116 U. S., 1, at page 6:
“But in this court, exercising an appellate jurisdiction, whatever was matter of law in the court appealed from is matter of law here, and -whatever was matter of fact in the court appealed from is matter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Steiner v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Allen v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- City of Cincinnati v. Criterion Advertising Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Harkow v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Hughes v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Leibrock v. BriggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Park v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Sutton v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981