Legal Opinion

Allen v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The plaintiff claims that the classifica- . tion of his automoibles under said ordinance as public vehicles is illegal and únjust, unconstitutional and void, for the reason that said automobiles are not public vehicles or common carriers, but are strictly private livery vehicles, or used'in each instance as a'private contract carrier. That the plaintiff does not hold himself out to the public indiscriminately to give service to the utmost of his capacity to all who may apply for service in said vehicles; that at all times he reserves the right at his discretion to hire said automobiles or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Jackson v. Copelan, Chief of PoliceOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Youngstown v. HarringtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API