Legal Opinion
Hughes v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1946No. 4796PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LaPRADE, Judge.
This appeal involves the validity of Ordinance No. 3907 of the City of Phoenix, the title of which reads as follows:
“Ordinance No. 3907.
“An ordinance prohibiting the parking or standing of motor vehicles within the city in violation of the ordinances of the city regulating the same, declaring such illegal parking to be a nuisance and a menace to the safe and proper regulation of traffic, providing for the removal of such vehicle and its retention by the chief of police unjdl the payment of removal and storage charged; and declaring an emergency.” '
Section 1 of the act prohibits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. DormanySupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- City of Phoenix v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Wilcox v. HemmingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Steiner v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Waller v. OsbanSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gear v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Moton v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Park v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Sutton v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Cohen v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.