Legal Opinion

United Transportation Union v. South Carolina Public Railway Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1997No. 97-1418PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Chief Judge BOYLE joined.

OPINION

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge:

Under the Railway Labor Act (RLA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188, federal district courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over “major disputes” in railway labor relations, but lack jurisdiction over “minor disputes.” See Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n, 491 U.S. 299, 303-04, 109 S.Ct. 2477, 2480-81, 105 L.Ed.2d 250 (1989). Instead, minor disputes are subject to mandatory arbitration before the National Railroad…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re US Airways Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Fairbairn v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Perry v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  5. Csx Transportation, Inc. v. Brotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API