United States v. Guertler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The defendant’s first contention is that the offense, if any, was committed more than three years prior to the filing of the indictment and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. We cannot accept that argument. The defendant was under a continuing duty to keep the draft board notified of an address where mail would reach him. He had not done so within the period stated in the indictment. That period did not end until a good deal less than three years prior to the filing of the indictment.
2. The defendant also asserts that the trial judge exceeded his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. NettlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- United States v. TrypucCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. MinkoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3Cited by18 opinions
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kahn v. Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Joseph Omotunde FilaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Robert A. Woodring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.