Legal Opinion

United States v. Minkoff

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 2, 1943No. 310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was tried in the District Court for the Southern District of New York on an indictment in one count charging him, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, with conspiring with Anthony Barracato, two fictitious persons called John Doe and Richard Doé, as to which there was a severance before trial, and divers unknown persons to endeavor to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 241. It was alleged that the unlawful agreement was to have Barracato undergo an abdominal operation while he was being tried with twenty-one other defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Samples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. PolakoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. John David ProvooCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. John Gregory Ardito and Vincent PollinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Pueblo v. Díaz FigueroaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. United States v. GuertlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API