Legal Opinion

United States v. Trypuc

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 11, 1943No. 280PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The statute under which the appellant was convicted provides that any person “who in any manner shall knowingly fail or neglect to perform any duty required of him under or in the execution of this Act, or rules or regulations made pursuant to this Act” shall upon conviction be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than $10,000 or by both fine and imprisonment. 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 311. The appellant duly registered pursuant to the Act. The regulations (Art. 641.3) promulgated thereunder provide that “It shall be the duty of each registrant to keep his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartchy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Amendola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Daniel Jackson Oliver Wendel Holmes Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
  4. United States v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Richard Daniel Kokotan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API