Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Nobles Insulation Co. v. Magna Building Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided November 5, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 678PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE, Chief Judge.
This is a similar suit to United States for Use and Benefit of Hutto Concrete Company, Inc. v. Magna Building Corporation and United Bonding Insurance Company, 305 F.Supp. 1244, which I recently dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The same issue is raised here concerning applicability of the Miller Act to low-rent housing projects erected by local housing authorities under the Low-Rent Housing Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1436.
In view of the brief of Nobles Insulation Company I will add some remarks to what I said in the previous opinion. Citing United States to Use of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Noland Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Morris W. Lasley, Doing Business as Lasley Construction Company v. United States of America, for the Use of C. C. WestermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Hutto Concrete Co. v. Magna Building Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
- United States ex rel. Victory Electric Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Continental Casualty Company v. C. O. Brand, Inc., and Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hickey v. Crow Creek Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1974
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Rocky Marciano Construction Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Housing Authority of Bluefield v. BoggessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977