Morris W. Lasley, Doing Business as Lasley Construction Company v. United States of America, for the Use of C. C. Westerman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Chief Judge.
Appellee instituted this action under the provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S. C.A. §§ 270a-270d. His petition alleged that certain sums were due him as a subcontractor on a Capehart Housing Project located at Fort Bliss, Texas.
Appellants, defendants below, moved the district court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction to hear the case. The court held that jurisdiction was conferred upon it by the Miller Act, and accordingly overruled the motion. The case was submitted to the jury upon special interrogatories and judgment was entered…
2Cited by29 opinions
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of the Robertson Lumbercompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Continental Casualty Company, Inc. v. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., Allsop Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.