Legal Opinion

Morris W. Lasley, Doing Business as Lasley Construction Company v. United States of America, for the Use of C. C. Westerman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1961No. 18544_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Chief Judge.

Appellee instituted this action under the provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S. C.A. §§ 270a-270d. His petition alleged that certain sums were due him as a subcontractor on a Capehart Housing Project located at Fort Bliss, Texas.

Appellants, defendants below, moved the district court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction to hear the case. The court held that jurisdiction was conferred upon it by the Miller Act, and accordingly overruled the motion. The case was submitted to the jury upon special interrogatories and judgment was entered…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of the Robertson Lumbercompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Koppers Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
  5. Continental Casualty Company, Inc. v. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., Allsop Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API