People v. Warren
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Since the defendant had not yet completed the previously imposed terms of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Myrick, 84 AD3d 1272 [2011]).
Furthermore, this Court is without authority to reconsider the incarceratory component of the sentence on this appeal (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d at 635; People v Edwards, 89 AD3d 1034 [2011]; People v Myrick, 84 AD3d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MyrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012