Legal Opinion

People v. Warren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Since the defendant had not yet completed the previously imposed terms of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Myrick, 84 AD3d 1272 [2011]).

Furthermore, this Court is without authority to reconsider the incarceratory component of the sentence on this appeal (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d at 635; People v Edwards, 89 AD3d 1034 [2011]; People v Myrick, 84 AD3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MyrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API