Legal Opinion

State v. S.A.M.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2017No. A15-0950Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENT

2Dissent · LillehaugLillehaug, Justice

More than a decade ago, S.A.M. was convicted of felony burglary, but a district court thought he could be rehabilitated. The court stayed imposition of sentence and put S.A.M. on probation, which S.A.M. successfully completed. As a result, by the plain words of Minnesota law, S.A.M.’s felony conviction “is deemed to be for a misdemeanor.” Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd. 1(2) (2016). Now a misdemeanant, S.A.M, seeks a chance to prove that he is truly rehabilitated and that his criminal records should be expunged. But today, the court holds that—unlike other misdemeanants— S.A.M. cannot…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API