State v. S.A.M.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent 1
DISSENT
2Dissent · LillehaugLillehaug, Justice
More than a decade ago, S.A.M. was convicted of felony burglary, but a district court thought he could be rehabilitated. The court stayed imposition of sentence and put S.A.M. on probation, which S.A.M. successfully completed. As a result, by the plain words of Minnesota law, S.A.M.’s felony conviction “is deemed to be for a misdemeanor.” Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd. 1(2) (2016). Now a misdemeanant, S.A.M, seeks a chance to prove that he is truly rehabilitated and that his criminal records should be expunged. But today, the court holds that—unlike other misdemeanants— S.A.M. cannot…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.