Legal Opinion

Nisus Corp. v. Perma-Chink Systems, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 16, 2006No. 1:03-cr-00120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

VARLAN, District Judge.

This patent infringement action between plaintiff Nisus Corporation (“Nisus”) and defendant Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. (“Perma-Chink”) is before the Court for a decision on the merits following a seven-day bench trial that took place between June 1 and June 13, 2005. The parties waived their right to a jury trial. Nisus called seven witnesses in support of its case of patent infringement, while Perma-Chink cross-examined these witnesses in support of its defenses and counterclaims. By way of stipulation, the parties also submitted…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006