Legal Opinion
Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 5, 2006No. 01 C 3585PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
DARRAH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ole K. Nilssen and the GEO Foundation, Ltd., bring this action against Defendants, Osram Sylvania, Inc. and Os-ram Sylvania Products, Inc., for the alleged infringement of several patents. Plaintiffs originally alleged that Defendants infringed twenty-six patents. Subsequently, Plaintiffs withdrew infringement allegations for fifteen of the twenty-six patents. The eleven remaining patents in suit are United States Patent Nos. 4,857,806 (the “’806 Patent”); 5,164,637 (the “ ’637 Patent”); 5,233,270 (the “ ’270 Patent”); 5,343,123 (the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re OxyContin Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Magnetek, Inc. v. Kirkland and Ellis, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- CFL Technologies LLC v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Feit Electric Company, Inc. v. CFL Technologies LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.