Legal Opinion

McGehee v. Elliott

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2006No. 88A05-0509-CV-559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Chris McGehee appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Travis and Tamara Elliott (the “Elliotts”). McGehee raises two issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court’s findings that McGehee breached his contract to provide the Elliotts with a right of first refusal on McGehee’s land is clearly erroneous; and

II. Whether the trial court’s findings regarding damages are clearly erroneous.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 1

The relevant facts follow. On April 1, 2000, the Elliotts entered into a purchase agreement with McGehee to buy a 68.211-acre…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hempel v. Creek House TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. MCI, LLC v. Patriot Engineering & Environmental, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
  3. MDG International, Inc. v. Australian Gold, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
  4. Daniel Beach v. Teresa SpiechIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. The Law Office of Melvin O. Shaw, P.L.C. v. A & M Development, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API