Legal Opinion
MDG International, Inc. v. Australian Gold, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 17, 2009No. 1:07-cv-1096-SEB-TABPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADDRESSING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on Defendant, Australian Gold, Inc.’s (“Australian Gold”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on South Africa and the United Arab Emirates [Docket No. 37], filed on April 8, 2008; Australian Gold’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Mexico [Docket No. 39], filed on April 15, 2008; Australian Gold’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Cruise Ship Sales [Docket No. 97], filed on November 7, 2008; and Australian Gold’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on MDG’s Claim for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified On Schedule "A"District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Hess v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019