Legal Opinion
Cummins v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1939No. 29300PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
C. C. Cummins and M. J. Mitchell, record owners of an oil and gas lease, filed an action against Wm. Chandler, oil well driller, to recover damages for alleged faulty workmanship in the defendant’s drilling of a well on the lease, and also praying that the defendant’s lien on the lease be canceled. The defendant filed an answer and cross-petition, denying faulty workmanship and praying judgment against plaintiffs for the unpaid balance of the drilling contract price, and foreclosure of the lien.
The case was set for trial, and the plaintiffs defaulted, not appearing by their attorneys or in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keeling v. Travelers Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Winters v. MeansNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Carlisle v. State Ex Rel. Harris, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hunter v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wise v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- North Side State Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. DrabekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Gawf v. GawfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.