Myers v. Wadsworth Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. William H. Myers presented his claim for compensation against the Wadsworth Manufacturing Company for accidental injuries in defendant’s employ: On petition of defendant and the General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Limited, insurer,, to discontinue payments under an agreement. From an order denying the petition, defendants bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
A petition was filed by the defendants praying for reasons therein set forth that they be permitted to discontinue payment of compensation to plaintiff, or applicant, herein. Those reasons will be referred to later herein. It appears that prior to and on July 14, 1920, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant Wadsworth Manufacturing Company, in the city of Detroit, which company’s principal business was the building of automobile bodies; that it was operating under the workmen’s compensation law, and the other defendant had been designated, with the approval of the industrial accident…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Jendrus v. Detroit Steel Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Lesh v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Ramlow v. Moon Lake Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Stufflebean v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Kolbas v. American Boston Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Pritchard v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Connell v. Gilliland Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.