Legal Opinion
Groseclose v. Plummer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1939No. 9085PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The petition for rehearing is denied. However, since petitioner has stressed certain claims in his petition for rehearing which we did not treat at length in our opinion affirming the decision of the district court, we now withdraw and strike the original opinion and substitute therefor the following:
Petitioner is confined in a California penitentiary under the authority of a commitment from the Superior Court of the State of California based upon petitioner’s conviction in such court of three offenses of grand theft (Calif.Penal Code § 487) and.of being an habitual…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Urquhart v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. James Cannon v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- People v. LainoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. EdmondsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hoffman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.