State v. Edmondson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
Our opinion in this criminal appeal has two parts. Because the issues treated in part II are of no precedential value and are matters of concern to the parties only, part II will not be published.
I
Defendant was convicted on two counts of issuance of worthless checks. He contends that the trial court improperly enhanced his sentences as a habitual offender, see NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 (Repl.Pamp.1990), because the basis for the enhancement was a probated Texas conviction that had been set aside by a Texas court. He argues that the New Mexico habitual-offender statute does not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. LainoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.