Legal Opinion

Ganci v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Ganci and one Emanuel Lusco were jointly indicted under sections 1, 2, and 8 of the so-called Harrison Act of December 17, 1914, as amended by the act of February 24, 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6287g, and Comp. St. §§ 6287h, 6287n).

The indictment contained six counts. Eliminating indictment language, the charges of the respective counts may be summarized as .follows: (1) That defendants sold a quantity of heroin without having registered with the collector of internal revenue and without having paid the tax as provided by law; (2) that defendants sold the heroin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. WelshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Agnello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Murby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. Virginia Milanovich, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. State v. FenleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. In Re DooleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API