Legal Opinion

Agnello v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 1923No. 156PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants have been convicted under an indictment which charged them with the crime of conspiracy to commit the offense of selling heroin and cocaine without having registered or paid the .tax prescribed and in violation of the Act of December 17, 1914 (38 St. c. 1, p. 785) as amended by sections 1006, 1007, .and 1008 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 St. c. 18, pp. 1057-1132 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 6287g, 62871, 6287r]), commonly known as the Harrison Act. Each defendant has been sentenced to be imprisoned for a term of two years at Atlanta Penitentiary and to…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. Alejandrina TorresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. State v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API