Legal Opinion
Diede Construction Inc. v. Monterey Mechanical Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 2004No. A102035PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
Plaintiff Diede Construction, Inc. (Diede) was awarded a $12 million contract to renovate the city hall in the City of Livermore (the city). After the bids were opened but before Diede executed a contract with the city, defendant Monterey Mechanical Company (Monterey), a subcontractor Diede had listed in its bid pursuant to Public Contract Code 1 section 4104, informed Diede that its proposal contained a $300,000 mistake, that it would not honor the proposal, and that Diede should seek to be relieved of its bid to the city pursuant to sections 5101 and 5103. Diede nonetheless…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Saliba-Kringlen Corp. v. Allen Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weitz Co. v. Hands, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Flintco Pacific v. TEC Management ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016