Legal Opinion

Cewe v. Schuminski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1930No. Nos. 28,147, 28,148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Two actions, tried together, resulting in the direction of verdicts for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal from orders denying their motions for new trial.

Shortly before six a. m. January 1, 1929, an automobile driven by John Schuminski was run into by a train at a crossing. Schuminski and two of his passengers were killed. One of them was lone Cewe Webber, and the special administrator of her estate is plaintiff in one of the cases now before us. The other plaintiff is Gertrude Page, the only surviving occupant of the car at the time of the accident, who sues for personal injuries. Defendant is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. GackleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Morken v. St. PierreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Smith v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Wyant v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lee v. DeglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API