Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1931No. 28,667PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries and damages to plaintiff’s automobile resulting from a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and a bus owned by the defendant. The action was tried to a jury and a verdict for defendant returned.

Two questions are presented for review: (1) Whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence; (2) whether there were prejudicial errors in the court’s charge.

The issues of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence were submitted to the jury as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ploetz v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Johnson v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Melady v. South St. Paul Live Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Martin v. SchiskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Kramer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Scott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Rappaport v. Boyer & Gilfillan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API