Legal Opinion

BERNARD FREUNDEL v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2016No. 15-CO-899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLeese, Associate Judge:

Appellant Bernard Freundel pleaded guilty to fifty-two counts of voyeurism. The trial court sentenced Mr. Freundel to consecutive sentences of forty-five days of incarceration on each count and also imposed a fine on each count. Mr. Freundel argues that the consecutive sentences violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. We affirm.

I

In connection with Mr. Freundel’s guilty plea, the United States filed an information charging Mr. Freundel with fifty-two counts of voyeurism, in violation of D.C. Code § 22-3531(b)-(c) (2016 Supp.). With exceptions not pertinent here, those…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Gordon Alexander, United States of America v. Benjamin MurdockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RAMON R. CHERRY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. WassilieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  3. Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. In re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API