BERNARD FREUNDEL v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLeese, Associate Judge:
Appellant Bernard Freundel pleaded guilty to fifty-two counts of voyeurism. The trial court sentenced Mr. Freundel to consecutive sentences of forty-five days of incarceration on each count and also imposed a fine on each count. Mr. Freundel argues that the consecutive sentences violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. We affirm.
I
In connection with Mr. Freundel’s guilty plea, the United States filed an information charging Mr. Freundel with fifty-two counts of voyeurism, in violation of D.C. Code § 22-3531(b)-(c) (2016 Supp.). With exceptions not pertinent here, those…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Gordon Alexander, United States of America v. Benjamin MurdockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- RAMON R. CHERRY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Commonwealth v. WassilieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- In re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022