Legal Opinion

Meaney v. Rubega

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1997No. 95-320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BROCK, C.J.

The plaintiffs, John and Susan Meaney, appeal the Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) denial of their motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial based on the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury that brake failure is an affirmative defense. We affirm.

On June 10, 1992, plaintiff John Meaney was exiting his State Police cruiser at a construction site on Interstate 89 in Hopkinton when a vehicle operated by the defendant, Alfred Rubega, struck the cruiser. The plaintiffs sued the defendant for negligence and for loss of consortium. The defendant denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chellman v. Saab-Scania ABSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. McVey v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Dyer v. Herb Prout & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Coffel v. SpradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API