Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SPENCER v. WYRICK

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 2017No. Case 115,765Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

EDMONDSON, J.,

Concur in Part and Dissent in Part.

¶ 1 I concur in part and dissent in part to the Court’s' opinion for the following reasons.

¶ 2 Generally, no exercise of State executive power, State legislative power, or State judicial power is beyond this Court’s Article 4 constitutional role of review1 or the Court’s Article 7 adjudicatory jurisdiction or power to review that exercise of State power, unless the Constitution vests an exclusive judicial power in a different constitutional entity.2 *294The exercise of State power by the Judicial Nominating Commission is subject to review by an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar AssociationCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API