SPENCER v. WYRICK
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
EDMONDSON, J.,
Concur in Part and Dissent in Part.
¶ 1 I concur in part and dissent in part to the Court’s' opinion for the following reasons.
¶ 2 Generally, no exercise of State executive power, State legislative power, or State judicial power is beyond this Court’s Article 4 constitutional role of review1 or the Court’s Article 7 adjudicatory jurisdiction or power to review that exercise of State power, unless the Constitution vests an exclusive judicial power in a different constitutional entity.2 *294The exercise of State power by the Judicial Nominating Commission is subject to review by an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar AssociationCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · 1968
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.