Legal Opinion

Houghton Ex Rel. Houghton v. Reinertson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2004No. 03-1074PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

A number of plaintiffs brought this action to challenge the revised Medicaid eligibility rules of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (Colorado), which now permit consideration of self-funded retirement accounts. Colorado has applied the new rule both to initial applications for benefits and to annual eligibility redeterminations. Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, contending Colorado’s new rules violated the Medicaid Catastrophic Care Act (MCCA). 42 U.S.C. § 1386r-5. Plaintiffs Stepheny L. Sellers and R. Gene Sellers…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Roach v. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Roach v. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Poindexter v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API