Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Borough of Mountainside

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 22, 1964PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.

This case tests the validity of the use zoning of plaintiffs’ 12-acre tract fronting on U. S. Highway Route 22 in the Borough of Mountainside, Union County. They were denied a recommendation for a variance by the board of adjustment, N. J. S. A. 40:55-39(d), to permit commercial utilization of the entire parcel instead of a limited business use in one corner allowed by an earlier variance and single-family residential use specified for the parcel by the current municipal zoning ordinance. This action in lieu of prerogative writ was then…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Beirn v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Rockhill v. Township of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Home Builders Ass'n of Northern NJ v. PARAMUS BOR.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar GroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Kenwood Assocs. v. Bd. of Adj. EnglewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Stansbury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API