Legal Opinion

County of Kauai v. McGonagle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1936No. 2282PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

Under the provisions of Act 40, 2d Sp. S. L. 1932, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the “1932 Real Property Tax Act,” all real property in the Territory is subject to an annual ad valorem tax at a rate to be computed by the territorial treasurer. The method of determining the rate is prescribed by section 21 of the Act as amended (R. L. 1935, § 1921, Am. L. 1935, Act 191, § 1).

The Kauai county budget for the calendar year 1936, as submitted to the territorial treasurer on'February 19 of that year, disclosed that in computing the amount to be included…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Appeal of the Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Treloar v. Swinerton and Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Dalton v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. TamanahaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API