Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Mondelez Int'l, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 26, 2018No. 17–CV–00174 (MKB)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge:
*181Plaintiff Tamika Daniel commenced a putative class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Defendant Mondelez International Inc. (Compl., Docket Entry No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that "non-functional slack-fill" ("excessive empty space") in Defendant's Swedish Fish brand candy product (the "Product") misrepresents the amount of food, (id. ¶¶ 2-4), which violates sections 349 and 350 of New York's General Business Law ("GBL") and constitutes common law fraud under New York state law, (id. ¶¶ 58, 66, 72, 82). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Donnenfeld v. Petro, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Stemm v. Tootsie Roll Indus., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re Amla Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Bell v. Annie's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.