Legal Opinion
In re Amla Litig.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided July 31, 2018No. 16-cv-6593PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.
Nine individuals from eight different states brought fifteen claims against defendants L'Oreal USA, Inc. and its subsidiary Soft Sheen-Carson LLC (collectively, "L'Oreal"). All claims are based on alleged defects in the "Amla Legend Rejuvenating Ritual Relaxer" (the "product"), which is used to chemically straighten naturally curly hair. The product is a single kit that contains five components: (1) the scalp protector, (2) a relaxer cream, (3) a shampoo, (4) a conditioner, and (5) an oil moisturizer. Plaintiffs allege that defects in the relaxer cream and scalp…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Derick Ortiz, v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Bardsley v. Nonni's Foods LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Boateng v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Howze v. Mondelez Global LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
- Hrapoff v. Hisamitsu America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.