Legal Opinion

Sanitary Grocery Co. v. Soper

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoko, J.

In a suit in the Superior Court of Baltimore City .against a non-resident, defendant, an attachment w:as, laid in P’rince George?s County in the hands, of a garnishee1, a corporation of the State of Virginia, which had a place of business at Hyattsville in that county. It had no place of business in Baltimore and no agent there. The Act of 1890, chapter 549, now article 9, section 46, of the Code of Public General Laws, provides that:

“A writ of attachment may be served upon any person by way of garnishment wherever he may he found, either by the sheriff of the jurisdiction where said person…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morton v. GrafflinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Johnson v. StockhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Barr v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  4. Henderson Ex Rel. A. E. Tull & Co. v. Maryland Home Fire Ins.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  5. Boor ex rel. Hall v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Langville v. LangvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Thompson v. Central Metal & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API