Johnson v. Stockham
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit for Harford County (Watters, J.) The cause was argued before McSherry, C. J., Fowler, Briscoe, Page, Boyd and Schmucicer, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
The appellees were indebted to the appellant on two promissory notes and on an open account. Before the notes matured the appellant sued out, under the Act of eh. 648; an attachment in Harford County, and based the proceeding on the allegations that the debt had been fraudu lently contracted, and that the debtors were about to dispose of their property with intent to hinder, delay and defraud their creditors. Subsequently, but on the same day, another attachment was sued out of the Superior Court of Baltimore City by the same creditor against the same defendants, on the same grounds and upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coward v. DillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Evesson v. SelbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- President & Directors of Franklin Bank of Baltimore v. E. G. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
3Cited by21 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- De Maio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Williams v. MessickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Butler v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.