Legal Opinion
Treloar v. Keil & Hannon
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1918No. Civ. No. 1555PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff was injured in consequence of being struck by a vehicle driven by said E. P. Hannon, of the said firm. The action against said copartnership and the individual members thereof was based upon the claim of negligence in producing said accident and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the finding to that effect.
The claim as to the casualty company's liability grows out of the execution by said company of an indemnity insurance policy issued to said Keil Hannon.
The said policy provides:
"Pacific Coast Casualty Company, of San Francisco, California, hereinafter called the Company
hereby…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herring v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- American Employers' Liability Insurance v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Van Derhoof v. ChambonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.