Legal Opinion

State v. Allman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a general tax suit brought to collect from various named defendants delinquent state and county taxes on lands lying in Monroe county. Horace Van Deventer, a named defendant, answers denying that lands involved in which he owns an undivided half interest are subject to state and county taxes, and by cross-bill he seeks to recover back certain taxes heretofore paid under protest, and to enjoin further proceedings to tax said lands. The chancellor dismissed the cross-bill and Van Deventer appeals. His theory and insistence is that his lands lie within a certain strip of territory,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bird v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Howard & Herrin v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Needham v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. NAJO Equipment Leasing, LLC v. Commissioner of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. Town of Mount Carmel v. City of KingsportTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Tupman Thurlow Company v. MossDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API