Legal Opinion

In re Buttles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1941PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.

The will of Anthony Dugro, who died in 1884, established certain trusts which will ultimately vest in such of his children or their lawful issue as are survivors at the termination of the trusts. The appellant is entitled to participate, if she is the lawful issue of Anthony Dugro. The surrogate has determined that the marriage of Philip Henry Dugro, grandson of the testator, to the mother of the appellant was bigamous and that, therefore, the appellant is not a legitimate descendant of the testator. The ultimate sole issue before this court is whether Dorothea W. Dugro, II, is a lawful…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Hynes v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Dolan v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of BarcNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. Claim of Esmond v. Thomas Lyons Bar & GrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Denton v. DentonNew York Family Court · 1942
  5. Harsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API